https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105773 Appointment of an arbitrator for inter-linked contractual claims was challenged under Article 136, but the Court found no basis to interfere. The District Judge had appointed a retired Additional Chief Engineer in line with the High Court's direction, the appellant raised no serious objection to his continuance, and the arbitrator had already entered upon the reference. On those facts, the Court upheld the appointment and declined to disturb the High Court's order confirming it. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105773 Appointment of an arbitrator for inter-linked contractual claims was challenged under Article 136, but the Court found no basis to interfere. The District Judge had appointed a retired Additional Chief Engineer in line with the High Court's direction, the appellant raised no serious objection to his continuance, and the arbitrator had already entered upon the reference. On those facts, the Court upheld the appointment and declined to disturb the High Court's order confirming it. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 04 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105773