https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105768 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act depends on the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and continuous consideration of voluminous records does not by itself show non-application of mind. Mere incorporation of some language from the sponsoring authority's proposal is not fatal where the record reflects independent scrutiny. The right under Article 22(5) requires supply of relied upon material sufficient for an effective representation, but not every referred document or untranslated material must be furnished unless prejudice is shown. Section 5A preserves detention where grounds are severable, so defect in some material does not invalidate the order if independent grounds still support detention. en-us Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:54:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105768 Preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act depends on the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and continuous consideration of voluminous records does not by itself show non-application of mind. Mere incorporation of some language from the sponsoring authority's proposal is not fatal where the record reflects independent scrutiny. The right under Article 22(5) requires supply of relied upon material sufficient for an effective representation, but not every referred document or untranslated material must be furnished unless prejudice is shown. Section 5A preserves detention where grounds are severable, so defect in some material does not invalidate the order if independent grounds still support detention. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105768