<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 383 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105762</link>
    <description>Exemption for vanity bags depends on the ordinary commercial meaning of that expression, informed by tariff classification and dictionary meaning. Special construction for carrying cosmetics and a mirror distinguishes a vanity bag from a simple shoulder-strap handbag; generic trade descriptions as ladies bags do not establish eligibility. The exemption claim therefore fails. Whether post-job-work processing amounts to manufacture depends on whether identifiable finished articles were returned or essential processes remained to create marketable goods. That factual issue, together with duty computation and related penalty, requires fresh adjudication. Penalty cannot rest solely on an incorrect exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 383 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105762</link>
      <description>Exemption for vanity bags depends on the ordinary commercial meaning of that expression, informed by tariff classification and dictionary meaning. Special construction for carrying cosmetics and a mirror distinguishes a vanity bag from a simple shoulder-strap handbag; generic trade descriptions as ladies bags do not establish eligibility. The exemption claim therefore fails. Whether post-job-work processing amounts to manufacture depends on whether identifiable finished articles were returned or essential processes remained to create marketable goods. That factual issue, together with duty computation and related penalty, requires fresh adjudication. Penalty cannot rest solely on an incorrect exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>