<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1142 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105754</link>
    <description>Liability under a rehabilitation scheme and memorandum of understanding is confined to liabilities expressly assumed. The scheme placed certain identified obligations, including labour dues, on the State Government, while the memorandum limited the appellant&#039;s liability to the liabilities specifically mentioned in the agreed letters and clause 3. As the materials did not show that the arrears of salary due to the fourth respondent had been transferred to or assumed by the appellant, that obligation remained with the State of Orissa. The direction against the appellant was therefore set aside to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1142 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105754</link>
      <description>Liability under a rehabilitation scheme and memorandum of understanding is confined to liabilities expressly assumed. The scheme placed certain identified obligations, including labour dues, on the State Government, while the memorandum limited the appellant&#039;s liability to the liabilities specifically mentioned in the agreed letters and clause 3. As the materials did not show that the arrears of salary due to the fourth respondent had been transferred to or assumed by the appellant, that obligation remained with the State of Orissa. The direction against the appellant was therefore set aside to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>