<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 538 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105746</link>
    <description>A refund sanction order under the Central Excise Act was treated as an appealable order, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal was maintainable. Where the original refund order was non-speaking and the appellate authority had not examined the refund claim on merits, it could not finally decide the controversy itself. The proper course was to sustain the setting aside of the deficient order and remit the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication with reasons. The dispute was therefore sent back for reconsideration on merits by the Assistant Collector.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 538 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105746</link>
      <description>A refund sanction order under the Central Excise Act was treated as an appealable order, so the Revenue&#039;s appeal was maintainable. Where the original refund order was non-speaking and the appellate authority had not examined the refund claim on merits, it could not finally decide the controversy itself. The proper course was to sustain the setting aside of the deficient order and remit the matter to the original authority for fresh adjudication with reasons. The dispute was therefore sent back for reconsideration on merits by the Assistant Collector.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>