<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1132 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105743</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Coffee Board to substitute as the petitioner in a winding up petition against a company involved in a liability dispute over shortages in coffee stock. The Court found that the Coffee Board had a valid claim and directed the parties to choose between arbitration or evidence recording to resolve the issue. The case was postponed to allow for the selection of arbitrators if arbitration was chosen.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1132 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105743</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Coffee Board to substitute as the petitioner in a winding up petition against a company involved in a liability dispute over shortages in coffee stock. The Court found that the Coffee Board had a valid claim and directed the parties to choose between arbitration or evidence recording to resolve the issue. The case was postponed to allow for the selection of arbitrators if arbitration was chosen.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>