<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1130 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105741</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals and upheld the learned Single Judge&#039;s interim order appointing an auditor to verify the accounts in a dispute involving debtor-creditor relationships. It found that the Company Court acted within its jurisdiction, emphasizing the necessity of the interim order to determine the accurate financial position between the parties. The court rejected challenges to the validity of the order, noting the lack of bona fides in the appellant&#039;s defense and supporting the appointment of an auditor based on exceptional circumstances and the willingness of the respondent to produce necessary documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1130 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105741</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals and upheld the learned Single Judge&#039;s interim order appointing an auditor to verify the accounts in a dispute involving debtor-creditor relationships. It found that the Company Court acted within its jurisdiction, emphasizing the necessity of the interim order to determine the accurate financial position between the parties. The court rejected challenges to the validity of the order, noting the lack of bona fides in the appellant&#039;s defense and supporting the appointment of an auditor based on exceptional circumstances and the willingness of the respondent to produce necessary documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>