<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1129 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105740</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme for the permanent Bench at Ranchi confined that Bench to cases arising from specified districts and did not authorise transfer of matters from the principal seat to Ranchi. The same framework also required winding-up and connected company proceedings to remain under a unified company jurisdiction before the authorised Company Judge at the principal seat, rather than being split between different judges or seats. The court treated the attempted allocation to the Ranchi Bench as unsustainable under the company-law framework, while noting that no further operative direction was issued because of impending reorganisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1129 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105740</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme for the permanent Bench at Ranchi confined that Bench to cases arising from specified districts and did not authorise transfer of matters from the principal seat to Ranchi. The same framework also required winding-up and connected company proceedings to remain under a unified company jurisdiction before the authorised Company Judge at the principal seat, rather than being split between different judges or seats. The court treated the attempted allocation to the Ranchi Bench as unsustainable under the company-law framework, while noting that no further operative direction was issued because of impending reorganisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>