https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105732 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed broadly to cover workmen as part of the wider term "employee," and no wording in the provision excludes them. Pendency of an industrial dispute, or of proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, does not by itself preserve a dismissed employee's right to retain company quarters; unless the dismissal is stayed or set aside, continued occupation becomes wrongful and proceedings under section 630 remain maintainable. The provision was also upheld against constitutional challenge on grounds of legislative competence, discrimination, and infringement of the right to life. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:58:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105732 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed broadly to cover workmen as part of the wider term "employee," and no wording in the provision excludes them. Pendency of an industrial dispute, or of proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, does not by itself preserve a dismissed employee's right to retain company quarters; unless the dismissal is stayed or set aside, continued occupation becomes wrongful and proceedings under section 630 remain maintainable. The provision was also upheld against constitutional challenge on grounds of legislative competence, discrimination, and infringement of the right to life. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105732