<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 524 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105728</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous manufacturer and assessee records were preferred over a departmental inspection report for fixing the hot re-rolling mill&#039;s annual production capacity. The departmental measurement of the &quot;d&quot; factor at 275 mm was treated as unreliable because the report did not explain the measurement method, the technical basis for assessing a pinion inside a closed oil bath chamber, or the qualifications of those assisting the verification, and it also contained an apparent factual inconsistency. Consistent pre-duty documents from 1996 recorded the pinion distance as 10 inches or 254 mm, so the &quot;d&quot; factor was taken as 254 mm and capacity was to be re-determined on that basis in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:47:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 524 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105728</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous manufacturer and assessee records were preferred over a departmental inspection report for fixing the hot re-rolling mill&#039;s annual production capacity. The departmental measurement of the &quot;d&quot; factor at 275 mm was treated as unreliable because the report did not explain the measurement method, the technical basis for assessing a pinion inside a closed oil bath chamber, or the qualifications of those assisting the verification, and it also contained an apparent factual inconsistency. Consistent pre-duty documents from 1996 recorded the pinion distance as 10 inches or 254 mm, so the &quot;d&quot; factor was taken as 254 mm and capacity was to be re-determined on that basis in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>