<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 906 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105709</link>
    <description>The Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2000 was clarified to require reasons to be recorded when delay is condoned and immunity from penalty is granted, and the amended proforma was stated to capture those reasons in the certificate itself. The statutory provision was also read as contemplating reasons for such relief. On that clarification, no further relief was pressed and the writ petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 906 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105709</link>
      <description>The Company Law Settlement Scheme, 2000 was clarified to require reasons to be recorded when delay is condoned and immunity from penalty is granted, and the amended proforma was stated to capture those reasons in the certificate itself. The statutory provision was also read as contemplating reasons for such relief. On that clarification, no further relief was pressed and the writ petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>