https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105691 A miscellaneous application seeking modification of a stay order requiring deposit of duty was rejected because it repeated the same grounds already considered and disclosed no fresh material for review. The Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the deposit requirement, particularly as the duty amount was small, and therefore dismissed the request for relief from the pre-deposit direction. However, in the interest of justice, it allowed a further limited period of one month to comply with the deposit order and required compliance to be reported on the specified date, when the appeal would be taken up. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105691 A miscellaneous application seeking modification of a stay order requiring deposit of duty was rejected because it repeated the same grounds already considered and disclosed no fresh material for review. The Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the deposit requirement, particularly as the duty amount was small, and therefore dismissed the request for relief from the pre-deposit direction. However, in the interest of justice, it allowed a further limited period of one month to comply with the deposit order and required compliance to be reported on the specified date, when the appeal would be taken up. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105691