<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 535 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105690</link>
    <description>Rule 57Q confines Modvat credit for parts, components and spares to the specific categories of capital goods listed in the table. On that basis, flat spring claimed as a part of dies was held ineligible because dies are separately enumerated and the rule does not extend the benefit to parts of that distinct entry. By contrast, the loaded source required fresh scrutiny of its nature, function and role in the manufacturing process, because the lower authorities had not examined whether it formed part of the measuring instrument or otherwise met the definition of capital goods. The flat spring claim failed, while the loaded source issue was remanded for de novo consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 535 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105690</link>
      <description>Rule 57Q confines Modvat credit for parts, components and spares to the specific categories of capital goods listed in the table. On that basis, flat spring claimed as a part of dies was held ineligible because dies are separately enumerated and the rule does not extend the benefit to parts of that distinct entry. By contrast, the loaded source required fresh scrutiny of its nature, function and role in the manufacturing process, because the lower authorities had not examined whether it formed part of the measuring instrument or otherwise met the definition of capital goods. The flat spring claim failed, while the loaded source issue was remanded for de novo consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>