<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 974 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105686</link>
    <description>The Court asserted jurisdiction over property in liquidation, ruling that the land could not be subjected to proceedings under the Ceiling Act without its permission. Sale deeds executed after the winding-up order were deemed invalid, with ownership restored to the company. The Court directed the restoration of land ownership in revenue records and emphasized the Official Liquidator&#039;s role in the mutation process, clarifying the applicants&#039; limited involvement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 974 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105686</link>
      <description>The Court asserted jurisdiction over property in liquidation, ruling that the land could not be subjected to proceedings under the Ceiling Act without its permission. Sale deeds executed after the winding-up order were deemed invalid, with ownership restored to the company. The Court directed the restoration of land ownership in revenue records and emphasized the Official Liquidator&#039;s role in the mutation process, clarifying the applicants&#039; limited involvement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>