https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105678 An order that merely adjourns a Section 9 interim application and declines further restraint at that stage, without finally deciding the controversy or conclusively affecting substantive rights, is not a judgment. Such a purely interlocutory step lacks the finality needed for an appeal and is not appealable under the Delhi High Court Act, the Letters Patent, or Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appeal was therefore not maintainable, and the merits of the Section 9 proceedings remained open before the Single Judge. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105678 An order that merely adjourns a Section 9 interim application and declines further restraint at that stage, without finally deciding the controversy or conclusively affecting substantive rights, is not a judgment. Such a purely interlocutory step lacks the finality needed for an appeal and is not appealable under the Delhi High Court Act, the Letters Patent, or Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appeal was therefore not maintainable, and the merits of the Section 9 proceedings remained open before the Single Judge. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 06 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105678