<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 548 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105677</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was restored after the appellant later deposited the balance of the required pre-deposit. The Tribunal noted the prolonged delay in compliance but treated the case as one where substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. On that basis, it allowed restoration of the appeal to its original number and directed it to be listed for disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:57:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 548 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105677</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was restored after the appellant later deposited the balance of the required pre-deposit. The Tribunal noted the prolonged delay in compliance but treated the case as one where substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. On that basis, it allowed restoration of the appeal to its original number and directed it to be listed for disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>