https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105669 A counter-claim under section 19(8) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 is to be raised at the earliest stage, as it is treated as a cross-suit under a scheme comparable to Order VIII Rule 6A CPC. Late introduction of a counter-claim after evidence has substantially closed may be refused where it would reopen the trial, delay recovery proceedings, and prejudice the claimant. Relief under Article 226 remains discretionary, and interference is not warranted where no sufficient ground for writ intervention is shown. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:28:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105669 A counter-claim under section 19(8) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 is to be raised at the earliest stage, as it is treated as a cross-suit under a scheme comparable to Order VIII Rule 6A CPC. Late introduction of a counter-claim after evidence has substantially closed may be refused where it would reopen the trial, delay recovery proceedings, and prejudice the claimant. Relief under Article 226 remains discretionary, and interference is not warranted where no sufficient ground for writ intervention is shown. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105669