<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 424 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105662</link>
    <description>Credit of additional duty of customs was admissible to both manufacturing units where the imported consignment was received proportionately by each unit, even though the bill of entry was endorsed only in the name of one factory. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by earlier decisions and held that the endorsement in favour of the Kalol unit did not, by itself, disqualify the Nandesari unit from taking credit. On that basis, denial of credit to the Nandesari unit was unsustainable, and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:15:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 424 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105662</link>
      <description>Credit of additional duty of customs was admissible to both manufacturing units where the imported consignment was received proportionately by each unit, even though the bill of entry was endorsed only in the name of one factory. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by earlier decisions and held that the endorsement in favour of the Kalol unit did not, by itself, disqualify the Nandesari unit from taking credit. On that basis, denial of credit to the Nandesari unit was unsustainable, and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>