https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105661 Suspension of a CHA licence under Regulation 21(2) could not be sustained where the factual basis for each relied-upon ground had failed. The alleged operation under another person's CHA licence had already been set aside, the finding on diversion of duty-free goods under the DEEC scheme had been interfered with in remand proceedings, and the narcotics allegation could not survive after acquittal in the criminal case. With no surviving foundation for continuation of the suspension, the order was held unsustainable and the CHA licence was restored. en-us Thu, 30 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:13:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105661 Suspension of a CHA licence under Regulation 21(2) could not be sustained where the factual basis for each relied-upon ground had failed. The alleged operation under another person's CHA licence had already been set aside, the finding on diversion of duty-free goods under the DEEC scheme had been interfered with in remand proceedings, and the narcotics allegation could not survive after acquittal in the criminal case. With no surviving foundation for continuation of the suspension, the order was held unsustainable and the CHA licence was restored. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105661