<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 278 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105641</link>
    <description>On repeal followed by re-enactment, accrued liabilities and pending penalty proceedings under the repealed sales tax statute remained enforceable because the later Act preserved prior operation, liabilities and pending proceedings. The Court applied the saving principle under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, read with the corresponding state saving provision, and held that repeal does not extinguish pre-existing rights or liabilities unless the new law clearly shows contrary intent. As the penalty liability had arisen under the earlier Act and fell within the saving framework, jurisdiction to continue and conclude the proceedings survived the repeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 278 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105641</link>
      <description>On repeal followed by re-enactment, accrued liabilities and pending penalty proceedings under the repealed sales tax statute remained enforceable because the later Act preserved prior operation, liabilities and pending proceedings. The Court applied the saving principle under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, read with the corresponding state saving provision, and held that repeal does not extinguish pre-existing rights or liabilities unless the new law clearly shows contrary intent. As the penalty liability had arisen under the earlier Act and fell within the saving framework, jurisdiction to continue and conclude the proceedings survived the repeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>