<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105628</link>
    <description>A declaration under Rule 57G sent by post and received in the Excise office satisfied the filing requirement for Modvat credit because the rule did not prohibit postal submission. Postal evidence showed delivery to the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s office, so the assessee had complied with the statutory condition. Denial of credit solely on the ground that the declaration was not personally filed was unwarranted, and the refusal of Modvat credit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:34:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1130 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105628</link>
      <description>A declaration under Rule 57G sent by post and received in the Excise office satisfied the filing requirement for Modvat credit because the rule did not prohibit postal submission. Postal evidence showed delivery to the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s office, so the assessee had complied with the statutory condition. Denial of credit solely on the ground that the declaration was not personally filed was unwarranted, and the refusal of Modvat credit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>