<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105613</link>
    <description>Transporter compliance provisions under the Assam sales tax law were treated as ancillary machinery to the power of sales tax legislation, because they were designed to prevent tax evasion through furnishing particulars, maintaining accounts, and permitting search, seizure, and registration. The Court distinguished an earlier Haryana provision struck down for ambiguity, noting that the Assam scheme clearly covered transporters handling documents of title and persons in charge of goods carriers. The later registration requirement was also upheld as comparable to previously validated provisions and as not infringing fundamental rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105613</link>
      <description>Transporter compliance provisions under the Assam sales tax law were treated as ancillary machinery to the power of sales tax legislation, because they were designed to prevent tax evasion through furnishing particulars, maintaining accounts, and permitting search, seizure, and registration. The Court distinguished an earlier Haryana provision struck down for ambiguity, noting that the Assam scheme clearly covered transporters handling documents of title and persons in charge of goods carriers. The later registration requirement was also upheld as comparable to previously validated provisions and as not infringing fundamental rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>