<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 723 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105578</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the denial of Modvat credit by the Assistant Commissioner based on dealers not being authorized by manufacturers, as the requirement of authorization was deemed unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 723 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105578</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the denial of Modvat credit by the Assistant Commissioner based on dealers not being authorized by manufacturers, as the requirement of authorization was deemed unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>