<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 717 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105571</link>
    <description>Penalty for failure to file RT-12 returns was treated as justified where goods were cleared without intimation to the excise authorities and the returns were not filed within time. The default was regarded as a clear breach of the statutory return-filing obligation under Rule 54 read with Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. Rule 210 was held unavailable because a residuary penalty provision cannot be used where the default is specifically covered by other rules. The penalty was also found not to be disproportionate to the breach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 717 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105571</link>
      <description>Penalty for failure to file RT-12 returns was treated as justified where goods were cleared without intimation to the excise authorities and the returns were not filed within time. The default was regarded as a clear breach of the statutory return-filing obligation under Rule 54 read with Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules. Rule 210 was held unavailable because a residuary penalty provision cannot be used where the default is specifically covered by other rules. The penalty was also found not to be disproportionate to the breach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>