https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105515 Where a sanctioned BIFR scheme records that the modalities for placement of identified surplus employees were completed before sanction, those employees are treated as already absorbed in Government service. On that footing, a later State enactment prohibiting absorption did not apply to the employees covered by the scheme, because the placement had already been completed and could not be unsettle by the subsequent law. The broader constitutional questions on legislative competence, promissory estoppel, and the overriding effect of the BIFR framework were left open. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105515 Where a sanctioned BIFR scheme records that the modalities for placement of identified surplus employees were completed before sanction, those employees are treated as already absorbed in Government service. On that footing, a later State enactment prohibiting absorption did not apply to the employees covered by the scheme, because the placement had already been completed and could not be unsettle by the subsequent law. The broader constitutional questions on legislative competence, promissory estoppel, and the overriding effect of the BIFR framework were left open. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105515