https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105506 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs' order in a case involving the classification of imported goods as acrylic waste under sub-heading 5505.10 of the CETA. The appellants contested this classification, seeking retesting and cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner. The Tribunal found the denial of these requests violated natural justice, leading to a miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the matter was remanded for retesting or cross-examination to ensure a fair adjudication process and uphold principles of natural justice in determining the correct classification of the goods. en-us Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:26:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105506 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Customs' order in a case involving the classification of imported goods as acrylic waste under sub-heading 5505.10 of the CETA. The appellants contested this classification, seeking retesting and cross-examination of the Chemical Examiner. The Tribunal found the denial of these requests violated natural justice, leading to a miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the matter was remanded for retesting or cross-examination to ensure a fair adjudication process and uphold principles of natural justice in determining the correct classification of the goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105506