<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 518 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105504</link>
    <description>Electronic cash registers were treated as cash registering machines under the specific tariff entry rather than being moved to the residual electronic-systems entry. The language of Entry 90, which covered cash registering machines without limiting their mode of operation, prevailed over the broader and residual wording of Entry 97(b). Applying the rule that a specific entry overrides a general one, the Court found that additional electronic functions did not change the goods&#039; essential character as cash registers. The assessee&#039;s attempt to claim the lower rate under the residual entry therefore failed, and classification remained under Entry 90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 518 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105504</link>
      <description>Electronic cash registers were treated as cash registering machines under the specific tariff entry rather than being moved to the residual electronic-systems entry. The language of Entry 90, which covered cash registering machines without limiting their mode of operation, prevailed over the broader and residual wording of Entry 97(b). Applying the rule that a specific entry overrides a general one, the Court found that additional electronic functions did not change the goods&#039; essential character as cash registers. The assessee&#039;s attempt to claim the lower rate under the residual entry therefore failed, and classification remained under Entry 90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>