https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105474 A superimposed website address on a cricket telecast was treated as a branded graphic with commercial value rather than a neutral address line, because it encroached on the petitioner's exclusive clean-feed and domestic air-time marketing rights. The commentary states that repeated display of the graphic created continuing interference, supporting balance of convenience and irreparable injury for interim protection under section 9. It also notes that a petition for interim relief may be maintainable before commencement of arbitration where a valid arbitration agreement exists and there is a clear intention to refer the dispute to arbitration. The stated effect was interim restraint of the impugned display pending arbitration. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:49:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105474 A superimposed website address on a cricket telecast was treated as a branded graphic with commercial value rather than a neutral address line, because it encroached on the petitioner's exclusive clean-feed and domestic air-time marketing rights. The commentary states that repeated display of the graphic created continuing interference, supporting balance of convenience and irreparable injury for interim protection under section 9. It also notes that a petition for interim relief may be maintainable before commencement of arbitration where a valid arbitration agreement exists and there is a clear intention to refer the dispute to arbitration. The stated effect was interim restraint of the impugned display pending arbitration. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105474