<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 779 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Condonation of Delay Application filed by the Revenue due to administrative reasons for delay in filing an appeal. Despite detailed explanations provided, the Tribunal found the reasons cited were routine administrative processes and not justifiable grounds for condonation. Consequently, the appeal was deemed time-barred, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for delay condonation and the necessity of timely compliance with statutory deadlines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:47:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 779 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Condonation of Delay Application filed by the Revenue due to administrative reasons for delay in filing an appeal. Despite detailed explanations provided, the Tribunal found the reasons cited were routine administrative processes and not justifiable grounds for condonation. Consequently, the appeal was deemed time-barred, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for delay condonation and the necessity of timely compliance with statutory deadlines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>