<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 887 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105440</link>
    <description>Rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 requires a winding-up petition to be advertised in the Official Gazette of the relevant State or Union Territory and in specified newspapers. That mandatory mode of publication cannot be displaced by the court&#039;s discretion under rule 99, and the inherent powers preserved by rules 6 and 9 cannot override an express procedural requirement. The principle that a thing required by law to be done in a particular manner must be done in that manner was applied to treat Gazette publication as essential for wider publicity and authenticity. The petition therefore had to comply strictly with the prescribed advertisement requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 887 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105440</link>
      <description>Rule 24 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 requires a winding-up petition to be advertised in the Official Gazette of the relevant State or Union Territory and in specified newspapers. That mandatory mode of publication cannot be displaced by the court&#039;s discretion under rule 99, and the inherent powers preserved by rules 6 and 9 cannot override an express procedural requirement. The principle that a thing required by law to be done in a particular manner must be done in that manner was applied to treat Gazette publication as essential for wider publicity and authenticity. The petition therefore had to comply strictly with the prescribed advertisement requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>