<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 774 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the goods under the correct sub-heading, exempting them from penalties and confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision to remand the case for de novo consideration aimed to ensure a fair evaluation based on established legal principles and precedents, emphasizing consistency in applying valuation rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 774 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the goods under the correct sub-heading, exempting them from penalties and confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962. The decision to remand the case for de novo consideration aimed to ensure a fair evaluation based on established legal principles and precedents, emphasizing consistency in applying valuation rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>