<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 885 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105436</link>
    <description>The appeal for the winding up of a company under the Companies Act was dismissed by the Court, upholding the Company Judge&#039;s decision. The dismissal was based on the lack of evidence and failure to establish a prima facie case for winding up. The core issues included allegations of fraud in share allotment, lack of proper notice for board meetings, and disputes over share consideration. The Court emphasized the need for a strong legal basis to justify such drastic action and compared judgments in similar cases. The appeal was ultimately dismissed with costs, highlighting the insufficiency of evidence for winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:38:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 885 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105436</link>
      <description>The appeal for the winding up of a company under the Companies Act was dismissed by the Court, upholding the Company Judge&#039;s decision. The dismissal was based on the lack of evidence and failure to establish a prima facie case for winding up. The core issues included allegations of fraud in share allotment, lack of proper notice for board meetings, and disputes over share consideration. The Court emphasized the need for a strong legal basis to justify such drastic action and compared judgments in similar cases. The appeal was ultimately dismissed with costs, highlighting the insufficiency of evidence for winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>