<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 373 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105434</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the applicant in a dispute with the Municipal Corporation over the octroi rate on rectified spirit, determining it should be at 2% rather than the higher rate charged. The Court directed the recovery of the excess duty from the appellant. Despite the municipality&#039;s objection of unjust enrichment, the Court found the appellant entitled to recover the excess octroi amount and ordered a refund of Rs. 3,51,94,471 with 6% interest in installments. The burden of proof on passing on octroi to consumers was met by the applicant, leading to the municipality being instructed to refund the excess amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 373 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105434</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the applicant in a dispute with the Municipal Corporation over the octroi rate on rectified spirit, determining it should be at 2% rather than the higher rate charged. The Court directed the recovery of the excess duty from the appellant. Despite the municipality&#039;s objection of unjust enrichment, the Court found the appellant entitled to recover the excess octroi amount and ordered a refund of Rs. 3,51,94,471 with 6% interest in installments. The burden of proof on passing on octroi to consumers was met by the applicant, leading to the municipality being instructed to refund the excess amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>