https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105433 The court dismissed the writ petition without admission, emphasizing the importance of fairness and justice in interpreting whether a writ petition should fall under article 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India. It clarified its jurisdiction under article 227, highlighting that it could not act as a second appellate court over decisions by BIFR and AAIFR, and stressed the significance of factual findings by these authorities in the context of writ jurisdiction. The court underscored the need to evaluate each case based on its unique facts and ultimately declined to grant the writ of certiorari sought by the appellant. en-us Thu, 10 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:32:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105433 The court dismissed the writ petition without admission, emphasizing the importance of fairness and justice in interpreting whether a writ petition should fall under article 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India. It clarified its jurisdiction under article 227, highlighting that it could not act as a second appellate court over decisions by BIFR and AAIFR, and stressed the significance of factual findings by these authorities in the context of writ jurisdiction. The court underscored the need to evaluate each case based on its unique facts and ultimately declined to grant the writ of certiorari sought by the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 10 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105433