https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105425 A non-speaking dismissal of an earlier special leave petition does not, by itself, attract merger or res judicata so as to bar a later challenge to a review order, particularly where the review was filed in time and before the later challenge. The note also states that section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits correction only of clerical, arithmetical, or accidental slips, and cannot be used to add pendente lite interest where neither the award nor the decree granted that substantive relief. On that basis, the amendment was held impermissible and the challenged order unsustainable. en-us Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105425 A non-speaking dismissal of an earlier special leave petition does not, by itself, attract merger or res judicata so as to bar a later challenge to a review order, particularly where the review was filed in time and before the later challenge. The note also states that section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits correction only of clerical, arithmetical, or accidental slips, and cannot be used to add pendente lite interest where neither the award nor the decree granted that substantive relief. On that basis, the amendment was held impermissible and the challenged order unsustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 03 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105425