https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105423 Entitlement to Notification No. 5/98-C.E. turned on whether the manufacturer satisfied Serial No. 101 for a multi-locational composite mill. A demand based on an earlier adjudication order could not survive after that order had already been set aside by the Tribunal. The Commissioner (Appeals) followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in granting relief, and the appellate challenge disclosed no infirmity in that approach. The notification benefit was therefore upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:24:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105423 Entitlement to Notification No. 5/98-C.E. turned on whether the manufacturer satisfied Serial No. 101 for a multi-locational composite mill. A demand based on an earlier adjudication order could not survive after that order had already been set aside by the Tribunal. The Commissioner (Appeals) followed the Tribunal's earlier decision in granting relief, and the appellate challenge disclosed no infirmity in that approach. The notification benefit was therefore upheld and the Revenue's appeals failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 02 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105423