<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 833 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105419</link>
    <description>A binding arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional prerequisite for appointing arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Where the agreement binds only the signatories, non-signatories cannot be impleaded in arbitration merely because they are promoters or otherwise associated with a contracting party, unless they are shown to be parties to the arbitration agreement or to have an independent dispute within its scope. The court held that the impugned impleadment order lacked jurisdiction because the petitioners were not parties to the arbitration agreement, and set aside the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 833 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105419</link>
      <description>A binding arbitration agreement is a jurisdictional prerequisite for appointing arbitrators under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Where the agreement binds only the signatories, non-signatories cannot be impleaded in arbitration merely because they are promoters or otherwise associated with a contracting party, unless they are shown to be parties to the arbitration agreement or to have an independent dispute within its scope. The court held that the impugned impleadment order lacked jurisdiction because the petitioners were not parties to the arbitration agreement, and set aside the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>