https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105402 A writ challenge to a race club election was treated as outside Article 226 because the club was a private company governed by its memorandum and articles, with no sufficient material to show that it was a State instrumentality, agency, or other authority under Article 12. Government licensing, nominated stewards, and regulatory control did not establish public character or deep and pervasive State control. Allegations about ballot papers, ballot boxes, and corrupt practice raised disputed facts tied to internal election procedure and could not be examined in summary writ proceedings. The club was also regarded as a necessary party, and non-joinder was treated as fatal. Civil court remedies were recognized as the appropriate forum. en-us Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105402 A writ challenge to a race club election was treated as outside Article 226 because the club was a private company governed by its memorandum and articles, with no sufficient material to show that it was a State instrumentality, agency, or other authority under Article 12. Government licensing, nominated stewards, and regulatory control did not establish public character or deep and pervasive State control. Allegations about ballot papers, ballot boxes, and corrupt practice raised disputed facts tied to internal election procedure and could not be examined in summary writ proceedings. The club was also regarded as a necessary party, and non-joinder was treated as fatal. Civil court remedies were recognized as the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105402