https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105395 An FIR should not be quashed at the threshold where the allegations, taken at face value, disclose offences beyond a narrow company-law grievance. The complaint here alleged not only non-return of company property but also forcible removal of rubber stamps and a letterhead pad, and their use to transfer a vehicle into the appellants' names; on those facts, a prima facie offence was disclosed. The settled quashing principles require restraint unless there is no offence, a legal bar, absurdity, or manifest mala fides, and none of those grounds was made out. en-us Fri, 06 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:43:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105395 An FIR should not be quashed at the threshold where the allegations, taken at face value, disclose offences beyond a narrow company-law grievance. The complaint here alleged not only non-return of company property but also forcible removal of rubber stamps and a letterhead pad, and their use to transfer a vehicle into the appellants' names; on those facts, a prima facie offence was disclosed. The settled quashing principles require restraint unless there is no offence, a legal bar, absurdity, or manifest mala fides, and none of those grounds was made out. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 06 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105395