<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 927 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105386</link>
    <description>Proceedings before the Labour Court under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, initiated or continued after a winding-up order, are &quot;other legal proceedings&quot; against the company and require leave of the company court under section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Labour Court&#039;s adjudication and quantification of a workman&#039;s monetary claim was treated as a judicial proceeding capable of being dealt with by the winding-up court. An order passed without prior leave and without notice to the Official Liquidator was held not to bind the company in liquidation and was unenforceable against its assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:18:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 927 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105386</link>
      <description>Proceedings before the Labour Court under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, initiated or continued after a winding-up order, are &quot;other legal proceedings&quot; against the company and require leave of the company court under section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Labour Court&#039;s adjudication and quantification of a workman&#039;s monetary claim was treated as a judicial proceeding capable of being dealt with by the winding-up court. An order passed without prior leave and without notice to the Official Liquidator was held not to bind the company in liquidation and was unenforceable against its assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>