<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 924 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105381</link>
    <description>An arbitral tribunal was reconstituted after the petitioner expressed loss of confidence in the existing arbitrator and sought replacement to avoid further controversy in the proceedings. Without making any adverse finding on the arbitrator&#039;s conduct, the High Court considered it appropriate to appoint a retired High Court Judge as substitute arbitrator so that the reference could continue smoothly and without dispute. The request for appointment of another arbitrator was accepted, and the proceedings were directed to proceed before the newly appointed arbitrator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 924 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105381</link>
      <description>An arbitral tribunal was reconstituted after the petitioner expressed loss of confidence in the existing arbitrator and sought replacement to avoid further controversy in the proceedings. Without making any adverse finding on the arbitrator&#039;s conduct, the High Court considered it appropriate to appoint a retired High Court Judge as substitute arbitrator so that the reference could continue smoothly and without dispute. The request for appointment of another arbitrator was accepted, and the proceedings were directed to proceed before the newly appointed arbitrator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>