<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 921 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105378</link>
    <description>The court rejected the winding-up petition in a dispute between a courier company and a newspaper publishing entity over a barter arrangement. The court emphasized that issues related to the barter arrangement and non-utilization of the barter component required evidence and were not suitable for resolution through winding-up proceedings. The petitioner was directed to pursue remedies through a civil suit to address the contractual disputes and outstanding payments, highlighting the limitations of resolving such complex contractual issues through a winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 921 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105378</link>
      <description>The court rejected the winding-up petition in a dispute between a courier company and a newspaper publishing entity over a barter arrangement. The court emphasized that issues related to the barter arrangement and non-utilization of the barter component required evidence and were not suitable for resolution through winding-up proceedings. The petitioner was directed to pursue remedies through a civil suit to address the contractual disputes and outstanding payments, highlighting the limitations of resolving such complex contractual issues through a winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>