<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 920 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105377</link>
    <description>The Court ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to file a suit for recovery, with the deposited amount lying to the credit of the suit. All defenses, including limitation, were left open for the respondent to argue in the suit. If the amount was not deposited, the company petition would be admitted and advertised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 920 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105377</link>
      <description>The Court ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to file a suit for recovery, with the deposited amount lying to the credit of the suit. All defenses, including limitation, were left open for the respondent to argue in the suit. If the amount was not deposited, the company petition would be admitted and advertised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>