<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 948 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105358</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;bleaching earth&quot; in the advance licence and import policy was construed to include activated bleaching earth, because the commodity could exist in natural and activated forms and the policy clarification showed that activated bleaching earth was intended to be covered wherever bleaching earth was permitted as an input. Any residual doubt was resolved in favour of the importer, and the goods were held clearable under the licence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:17:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 948 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105358</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;bleaching earth&quot; in the advance licence and import policy was construed to include activated bleaching earth, because the commodity could exist in natural and activated forms and the policy clarification showed that activated bleaching earth was intended to be covered wherever bleaching earth was permitted as an input. Any residual doubt was resolved in favour of the importer, and the goods were held clearable under the licence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>