<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 895 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105348</link>
    <description>Execution against a company&#039;s estate after commencement of winding up requires leave of the company court, because commencement relates back to presentation of the winding-up petition; execution initiated after that date without leave is void. The note also states that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications made to a court under any enactment, including an Official Liquidator&#039;s application in winding-up proceedings, and Section 458A of the Companies Act, 1956 does not exclude that application. On that basis, the liquidator&#039;s request for return of realised amounts was treated as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 895 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105348</link>
      <description>Execution against a company&#039;s estate after commencement of winding up requires leave of the company court, because commencement relates back to presentation of the winding-up petition; execution initiated after that date without leave is void. The note also states that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to applications made to a court under any enactment, including an Official Liquidator&#039;s application in winding-up proceedings, and Section 458A of the Companies Act, 1956 does not exclude that application. On that basis, the liquidator&#039;s request for return of realised amounts was treated as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>