<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 923 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105342</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to restore the respondent&#039;s name in the Register of Members. The amendments to the Articles of Association were deemed legally valid, and the execution of the transfer was compliant with Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956. However, the court found that the decision to cancel the respondent&#039;s membership was not bona fide, leading to the restoration of the respondent&#039;s membership status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:29:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 923 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105342</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to restore the respondent&#039;s name in the Register of Members. The amendments to the Articles of Association were deemed legally valid, and the execution of the transfer was compliant with Section 108 of the Companies Act, 1956. However, the court found that the decision to cancel the respondent&#039;s membership was not bona fide, leading to the restoration of the respondent&#039;s membership status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>