<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 929 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105338</link>
    <description>Conflicting Tribunal rulings on whether making electric transmission poles amounts to manufacture left the legal position unsettled until resolution by a Larger Bench. At the pre-deposit stage, that uncertainty entitled the assessee to the benefit of the doubt, so waiver of deposit pending appeal was justified. The assessee was therefore not required to make the pre-deposit, and the appeal was to proceed without insisting on deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:06:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 929 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105338</link>
      <description>Conflicting Tribunal rulings on whether making electric transmission poles amounts to manufacture left the legal position unsettled until resolution by a Larger Bench. At the pre-deposit stage, that uncertainty entitled the assessee to the benefit of the doubt, so waiver of deposit pending appeal was justified. The assessee was therefore not required to make the pre-deposit, and the appeal was to proceed without insisting on deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>