https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105315 An appeal under the Central Excise Act lies only against a final adjudicatory order, not against an interlocutory direction under Section 35F requiring pre-deposit, so the challenge to the interim order was not maintainable. Since the amount directed to be deposited had already been paid within the stipulated time, the impugned direction had in any event been complied with and the challenge had become infructuous. The substantive appeal was left to proceed before the Commissioner (Appeals) in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:23:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105315 An appeal under the Central Excise Act lies only against a final adjudicatory order, not against an interlocutory direction under Section 35F requiring pre-deposit, so the challenge to the interim order was not maintainable. Since the amount directed to be deposited had already been paid within the stipulated time, the impugned direction had in any event been complied with and the challenge had become infructuous. The substantive appeal was left to proceed before the Commissioner (Appeals) in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105315