<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 443 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105304</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up, finding it misconceived and an abuse of the court&#039;s process. The petitioner failed to establish the necessary grounds under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act. The court emphasized the availability of alternative remedies and the lack of just and equitable reasons for winding up. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=142342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 443 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105304</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up, finding it misconceived and an abuse of the court&#039;s process. The petitioner failed to establish the necessary grounds under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act. The court emphasized the availability of alternative remedies and the lack of just and equitable reasons for winding up. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>