https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105293 A plaintiff alleging that a company and its directors were jointly and severally liable for a debt could implead those persons at the interlocutory stage, because the plaintiff as dominus litis was entitled to choose parties said to be liable. The court noted that the trial court had not finally determined the directors' liability on merits and had only treated them as necessary parties. As liability had yet to be proved by evidence, the defendants' joinder could not be disturbed at that stage, and the challenge to impleadment failed. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:25:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105293 A plaintiff alleging that a company and its directors were jointly and severally liable for a debt could implead those persons at the interlocutory stage, because the plaintiff as dominus litis was entitled to choose parties said to be liable. The court noted that the trial court had not finally determined the directors' liability on merits and had only treated them as necessary parties. As liability had yet to be proved by evidence, the defendants' joinder could not be disturbed at that stage, and the challenge to impleadment failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=105293